A few pointers on the ‘MU’ attestation process

More than 56,000 providers have registered for the Medicare or Medicaid electronic health records meaningful use programs through May 2011.

Through May, state Medicaid agencies have paid more than $114 million in incentive payments and Medicare payments have hit $75.8 million.

Some general points include the following:

Register long before being ready to attest for meaningful use to ensure any problems are resolved and attestation doesn’t get delayed. Registration in the program doesn’t commit you to anything

Providers register for the Medicare or Medicaid programs on the same CMS Web site, but those attesting to Medicaid meaningful use will do so on a state-specific Web site.

* Get your EHR’s meaningful use certification number (which is required) from the government’s Certified HIT Product List Web site, not the vendor.

* A provider can leave the Medicare attestation system during the process and save the data already inputted, then return later to complete the task before data is submitted to CMS.

* On attestation pages, most measures have a data field for the numerator first followed by the denominator, but the boxes are reversed for clinical quality measures.

* The registration does not currently support batch registration of eligible professionals  so EPs must be registered on an individual basis.  CMS is asked about this frequently and plans to address the issue in the future.

* Eligible providers can designate a third party, such as an office manager, to register and attest on their behalf.

* A provider who fails attestation need not wait for 90 days to re-attest, but can select a different 90-day reporting period–even if it varies by only a day or so from the previous period. For instance, barely missing a required numerator for a specific measure may be fixed by changing the reporting period by a few days, a week or a month.

* The current timeline for Stage 2 meaningful use is publication of a proposed rule in January 2012 and a final rule in June 2012.


2 thoughts on “A few pointers on the ‘MU’ attestation process

  1. Ani August 9, 2011 / 8:50 pm

    I think this program is going to prove more beneficial than anyone is anticipating. EHR innovations are so exciting because they’re the first step in actually getting this whole Health Information Exchange and healthcare reform on the road. Technology has helped automate everything else in our lives, so why not apply it to what is seemingly most important? I’m looking forward to seeing where EHRs take us in the future.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s